"The criminal case was dropped by Mr. Monono because Mr. Nouma does not have any liquidity nor equity (meaning, Mr. Nouma is a poor man) that he could have gone after." JWN
Dear
fellow Cameroonians,
 |
| ByJackson W. Nanje |
Like
anyone of you out there, I watched the numerous videos that Patrice Nouma put
out on YouTube about the alleged misuse and misappropriation of funds at the
Cameroon Mission by the Treasurer, Kinge Monono, and I was very troubled. Troubled
that, if these accusations were true, then, Mr. Kinge Nganje Monono deserves to rot in prison. I also concluded that, this Monono fellow is a bad dude. But like any good
investigator would do, “verify to believe.” So, it was because of my curiosity
that I dispatched the investigators of Nanje School of Creative Thinking to
search for the truth. At the end of our investigations we found out that, Mr.
Patrice Nouma (1) is not a truthful man to rely on
(2) he had a troubled swindling past (3) that he falsely acquired information
that he had no authority over with the aide of a bank accomplice (4) he falsely
defamed the Cameroon Mission Treasurer (5) his vicious act caused a breach of
trust by the bank (6) he brought negligence charges against the bank even
though the charge was dropped later because of the dithering act by the ambassador of the Cameroon
Mission, who let the statute of limitations to expire,
amongst other charges.
Finally,
Patrice Nouma’s lies are beginning to catch up with him. Who is Patrice Nouma
and why has he received such enormous notoriety in our community? Has anyone
ever thought of subjecting what he puts out in the form of YouTube videos for consumption to
any form of scrutiny? That is the journey we want to embark on in this write up.
But before we indulge you to read this write-up about how Nouma was brought to
submission by Cameroon Mission’s Treasurer, Kinge Nganje Monono in a New Jersey
court, we want to oblige you to watch this video impugning his character https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CM4vo2LwsuM&t=35s which has not been disputed by
him or asked YouTube retract it.
The
investigators of Nanje School of Creative Thinking know too well of flamboyant and
great communicators like Patrice Nouma, who have a very dark side. They equally
understand that Nouma is a very patriotic Cameroonian who will give up
everything to risk his life for good of his country like he portrayed in this
video in which he lamented at the dilapidated state of the Cameroon Embassy in
Washington D.C https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRqgxflprAM We cannot however be lust/lost
in his patriotic heroism, to ignore some of his misrepresentations,
imperfections and criminal acts on others. And, we cannot also discount the
numerous stories told in the first video above as merely an attempt to dent his
character. There are numerous verifiable true stories whereby Nouma has been
found engaged in deceptive acts in the past. For example, when he told the
receptive Cameroon public in 2010 (that’s willing to believe anything that focuses
on attacking the CPDM-led government) that Monono was writing checks to
Cameroonians indiscriminately during the President’s visit in New York for the
United Nation’s Annual General Assembly.
The
reason for this write up however, is to emphasize on the exoneration of the
Cameroon Mission’s Treasurer, Kinge Nganje Monono, who sued
(https://www.alafnet.com/camerouns-patrice-nouma-dragged-to-us-court/
 |
Cameroon Mission Treasurer
Kinge Nganje Monono
|
https://www.alafnet.com/tag/kinge-monono/) Nouma in a New Jersey court
recently, for defamation and for illegally obtaining documents from his
accomplices (PNC bank of Maryland and its Cameroonian native employee at the
bank). The judge rendered a judgment in favor of Cameroon Mission and Monono. What
caused the Cameroon Mission Treasurer to drag Mr. Patrice Nouma and the PNC
bank to court?
To
begin, we want to explain to our readership how the Cameroon Mission functions
during the President’s annual visits to New York in September and how Patrice
Nouma’s lack of understanding of this process might have led him to misinform
his viewers. Before the President travels to New York, a budget of his visit is
submitted by the Ministry of Finance to Parliament. That budget is scrutinized
during a debate after which, an authorization is given by parliament to the
Finance Ministry to disburse that approved sum to the Treasurer of the Cameroon
Mission in New York who happens to be Kinge Monono. The Treasurer executes this
approved sum as designated by his boss in Yaoundé. For Nouma to subject
Monono’s competency for a process he knows nothing about is an example where
education has gone acidic. This lack of understanding of Parliamentary Process
and Procedure and budgetary allocation is a serious obstacle confronting Nouma.
The second issue confronting the inquisitor is criminal in nature. How did
Nouma obtain the returned checks written by the Cameroon Mission Treasurer?
Could he have passed through the Mission’s ambassador? Did the PNC bank violate
its fiduciary (trust) responsibility? Was there an accomplice working for the
bank who could have illegally given these checks to Mr. Nouma? These are the
questions upon which shall be answered.
It
is important for the public to know that the Treasurer of the Cameroon Mission
is the only authorized signatory to the Cameroon Mission’s bank account. It is
not if this is the case, it is the case. Now that we have established this to
be the case let us ask the following questions:
a.
How
then did Mr. Nouma get those numerous returned checks that the Treasurer had
written to the approved individuals which he brandished on his YouTube videos?
We know that his end game was to embarrass the Treasurer nonetheless, by
exposing these returned checks to the public.
b.
Since
the returned Checks were given to Nouma who has no relational relationship with
the Cameroon Mission by an employee of the PNC bank, a branch on 4749 Sangamore
Road, Bethesda Maryland. Who could be that employee and what could have been
his/her motive?
c.
The other question points directly to the
Cameroon Mission’s ambassador, Tommo Monthe. How come checks written to him by
the Treasurer to pay out certain invited groups were not included in the videos
brandished by Nouma even as we are aware that Nouma had met with him privately
to discuss the Treasurer’s bank related activities oblivious of the fact that
those activities were sanctioned by Cameroon government and Monono was just the
executioner?
d.
When
Ambassador Tommo Monthe summoned the Treasurer to discuss Nouma’s submissions
to him, why was he complacent about the Treasurer’s request to provide the checks
that Nouma had given him? Why did he refuse to write an authorization letter
that the bank had requested of the Treasurer to get the information that he needed
to pursue the perpetrators?
e.
And
even when the Treasurer informed the Minister of Finance of the breach of trust
by the bank and ordered the ambassador to write a letter that would enable the
Treasurer to pursue the culprits as requested by the bank, why did the
ambassador ignore to write the letter?
f.
Could
it have been also that the Treasurer’s secretaries were the ones feeding Nouma with
the information to destroy or blackmail him?
g.
Was
the ambassador aiding and abating Nouma to destroy the Treasurer?
h.
What
was the purpose of pursuing the Treasurer who was merely executing his duty as
Chief Financial Officer at the Cameroon Mission?
These
are a few of the questions that the investigators of Nanje School of Creative
Thinking must unravel, to get to the truth about Nouma’s inconsequential
escapades. This report is a product of a long interview we had with Kinge
Monono and we also used the court transcripts (which are public documents), to
determine the opinion of Patrice Nouma and the PNC bank rather than speaking to
them directly. The court transcripts shall show word verbatim what Nouma told
the judge as his utterances are accurately transcribed by the Court Registrar. And
because we have a duty to accurately report our findings to our readership, we have
attached these documents as part of this report. But for now, let us attempt to
trace the genesis of Nouma’s beef with the Treasurer.
 |
Cameroon Mission
Ambassador, Tommo Monthe
|
In
2010, in his attempt to impress his viewership and shame Monono and the
Cameroon government, Nouma who lives in New York, traveled across the neighboring
state (Bethesda, Maryland), to pay and obtain Cameroon Mission’s returned
checks from a PNC bank employee, Henriette Akamba Akono, a Cameroonian-born, who has
since been fired by the bank for a breach of trust. These checks, illegally
obtained, were foolishly brandished on his YouTube channel and the content for
which those checks were written to the respective recipients misrepresented by
Nouma. His goal here was to defame Kinge Monono and to shame the Cameroon
government. And the reason why this case has dragged on for seven (7) years is
because of administrative delays by the ambassador, His Excellency Tommo
Monthe. The ambassador, for some strange reason, completely refused to provide
Monono a letter which PNC bank had requested of him before they could disclose
the identity of Nouma’s fugitive accomplice who had provided him copies of the
Mission’s returned checks, which is clearly a criminal offense. Why did the ambassador
refuse to provide an mere authorization letter to the only authorized signatory
to the Mission’s account? Remember that the Cameroon Mission’s ambassador is
the boss of the Cameroon Mission who supervises the Treasurer’s activities as
well.
After
the Cameroon Mission Treasurer uncovered that someone order than him had requested
information from the PNC bank Maryland branch, he traveled to Maryland to get
more information from the bank manager of the branch. It was upon his arrival
at the bank that he was told to present an authorization from the Cameroon
Mission ambassador before accessing records at that branch. After establishing
that a breach of trust by the bank had occurred, his lawyer had advised him---that---the
bank will be sued for negligence. But first, the letter from the ambassador was
a precursor to establishing a negligence lawsuit. The Treasurer excitingly
drove back to New York to get the letter from the ambassador, but he resisted
to furnish him with the letter. Why did the ambassador not provide the Treasurer
the letter upon request? The Treasurer then reported the issue to the Minister
of Finance who ordered the ambassador to issue the letter to enable the
Treasurer to pursue those who were involved in enabling the transaction. Yet
again, he accepted the minister’s request but still resisted issuing the
letter. The negligence and breach of trust by the PNC bank started in 2010 and
the statute of limitations to sue for negligence is four (4) years in New
Jersey. It was only in 2017 that the ambassador issued the letter to the
Treasurer to take to the bank, three (3) years after the expiration of the
statute of limitations. The statute of limitations (it’s the moment at which
the plaintiff has a basis to sue) to sue for negligence had expired and the
fugitive bank employee, Henriette Akamba Akono, had been fired by the bank. This begs
the question: was Ambassador Tommo an accomplice to the scheme to bring down the
impeccable Cameroon Mission Treasurer? Or was he stalling to prevent a lawsuit
against his very good friend, Patrice Nouma? Even as there is so much that
could be inferred from the ambassador’s obstructionist act, the investigators
of Nanje School of Creative Thinking believe that there is some degree of
collusion (conspiracy) between Ambassador Tommo and Nouma against the Treasurer.
 |
Nouma's PNC Bank Agent
Henriette Akamba Akono
|
Obstructionist
standing in his way by way of the ambassador to uncover the truth,
the
Treasurer went forward with the lawsuit against the PNC bank and Patrice Nouma.
The issue in contention here is, how did Patrice Nouma gain access to the
state’s account when he was not a state employee and why did the bank grant him
access when it is clearly stated that only Kinge Monono had access to the
account? Clearly, the PNC bank, where the Treasurer opened the account in New
Jersey had established that, the checks were given to Patrice Nouma by an employee
whose name they could not reveal at that bank branch. He traveled to Maryland in
his attempt to unmask who was behind the fraudulent activity. Mr. Patrice Nouma
got the name of Cameroon Mission’s bank account presumably from his friend, the
ambassador or from her fugitive bank friend, Henriette Akono. It was Ms. Akono
who embarked on the criminal act, clearly in violation of the bank’s internal
policies, to access the Mission’s account which she provided to Patrice Nouma
with the returned checks.
 |
Agent Provocateur
Patrice Nouma
|
We have now established
that, it is because Patrice Nouma illegally and fraudulently obtained
information from the bank that caused the Treasurer to sue him in court. And
judgement was rendered against Patrice Nouma in favor of Kinge Nganje Monono.
This judgement against Patrice Nouma is the first, and I am sure they could be
many more but nobody before Mr. Monono has ever dragged him in court. As part
of the judgement, Mr. Monono accepted a plea bargain suggested by Mr. Nouma’s
attorney which was, to remove all the YouTube untruthful videos against Mr.
Monono. The criminal case was dropped by Mr. Monono because Mr. Nouma does not
have any liquidity nor equity (meaning, Mr. Nouma is a poor man) that he could have gone after. The lawsuit has not ended with Mr. Nouma’s plea
bargain; the Cameroon Mission Treasurer still has another day in court with the
bank, which he is suing for a breach of trust because of the malicious act of its employee who coerced into giving out private information
to an unauthorized individual, Mr. Patrice Nouma.
No comments:
Post a Comment