If the Oroko people should consider themselves as civilized, they should therefore fit within the defined scope of civilization, which is “the ability of human beings to live harmoniously with other groups of people (like the afore-mentioned), towns, cities and other government.” Knowing that we must live harmoniously with the Barombi faithful neighbors, what then could be the raison d’ėtre for their exclusion? JWN
ByJackson W. Nanje |
Over the past couple of years, the
Oroko people of Ndian division have grappled with the idea of including the people
of the Barombi tribe as one of our own. It is true that the dialects of the Oroko tribes
and that of the Barombi tribe are completely different; but dialect alone does
not define a people. While the Barombi natives have no problem understanding
and speaking the Oroko language, the Oroko people on the other hand, have
resisted any attempt to integrate with the Barombi people. It is obvious that
the Oroko people have adopted the ethnocentric attitude of rejecting the
Barombi people even though they will forever remain a part of the Oroko people
by nature of their proximity. The Barombi people on the other hand have adopted
the acculturalization (borrowing the traits of people from their pristine
environment) attitude, by adapting in their environment. They understand and
speak the Oroko language and have equally accepted much of the Oroko mores and
have blended many aspects of the Oroko culture into their culture. For example,
the Oroko people call elephant Njoku and the Barombi call it same. Similarly,
the Oroko people call a certain masquerade (Ngoba) and the Barombi call it the
same way. Pepper (Ndonga) is called the same way by both ethnic groups. There
are many other cultural aspects that the Barombi people have taken from the
Oroko people and integrated into their language because they understand that,
as members in an unfamiliar environment, you must adapt.
In the South West
Region, there are fourteen (14) Barombi villages. Eleven of them are in Ndian
division and three (3) in Meme division. These are the Barombi villages in
Ndian division: (1) Bekora native name
Kange (2) Mokono (Nkono) (3) Dora (Loh) (4) Lipenja (Penja) (5) Bongongo I
(M’palle) (6) Bongongo II M’palle (7) Ngatame (8) Bekarakara (9) Mbengwi
(Mbenge) (10) Mbionang (11) Ngoss
And in Meme division,
we have the following Barombi villages: (12)
Kotto (13) Mbo (14) Kang
All the Barombi
villages are interspaced between or are surrounded by Oroko villages and, over
the many years that we have lived together, they have proven themselves as the
best neighbors that the Oroko people have ever had and whom they should rely
on. And since they now own these various villages and own their chiefs,
ostracizing them is the wrong path the Oroko man should ever take. It is
therefore imperative for the Oroko people to abandon their ethnocentric
attitude and accept the Barombi people as one of their own. And since the
Barombi people first choice of marriage away from their clan is the Oroko
people, and knowing that they are quite willing to assimilate I strongly
believe that, over time, the Barombi culture will assume all aspects of the
Oroko culture.
Besides the cultural
aspect that give us a stand-alone reason to be considered as brothers, there is
a political reason why we should see each other as people hewn from the same
family. In politics, the more, the merrier. The Oroko people should always
embrace every opportunity to increase their numbers because it compensates
handsomely in the national economic distribution of wealth. With the eleven
Barombi villages, twenty-seven Balue villages, and fifteen Balondo Ba Nanga
villages, Ndian parliamentarians should be making the case for two
parliamentarians in that Region instead of the one it currently has now. If we
continue to reject a huge segment of the Ndian population because of cultural
dissimilarities, as a people, we shall never evolve, politically.
If we look at the
beautifully designed Oroko USA website (which is the richest in content), many
villages and towns (Isangele, Bamuso, Kumbo Etindi, Kumbo Abedimo, Idabato) that
are in Ndian division and that can be easily amalgamated, have been left out
and yet, these people commune with us during our cultural events and activities
be it in the United States or Cameroon. If the Oroko people should consider
themselves as civilized, they should therefore fit within the defined scope of
civilization, which is “the ability of
human beings to live harmoniously with other groups of people (like the
afore-mentioned), towns, cities and other government.” Knowing that we must
live harmoniously with the Barombi faithful neighbors, what then could be the raison
d’ėtre for their exclusion? Politics is a game of numbers; the Oroko land should
be assimilating more people to encourage development and by so doing, they will
be moving away from nativity to civility.
When we practice the
politics of inclusion, we would therefore begin to make the case of requesting for
more members of parliament to serve our division. We currently have a proportionate
population in Ndian division large enough to provide us with at least seven (7)
Members of Parliaments however, we have not been organized enough to present
our case for re-districting all due to politics of exclusion.
In conclusion, we must
understand that even though we want to preserve our heritage, we must learn to
embrace peaceful neighbors like the natives of the Barombi clan, Isangele,
Idabato, Kumbo Etindi, Kumbo Abedimo, who are always so willing to adapt to our
culture and traditions. In sheer numbers, we conquer, and in small numbers, we
are reduced to insignificance.